This document presents a theoretical framework for four-dimensional scale space, in which the familiar three spatial dimensions (x, y, z) are extended by a fourthdimension s — the scale coordinate. A point (x, y, z, s) has not only a spatial location but a scale address. Equal steps in s produce equal ratios of apparent physical size. The unit of s is the nat (from ‘natural log’), with s = 0 corresponding to 1 metre (human scale). The founding hypothesis — that physical scale constitutes a genuine fourth spatial coordinate — was first conceived by Donald Palmer in 1977 and developedover nearly five decades, with formal academic statements in two peer-reviewed publications in autumn 2025. The present document translates that hypothesis intoa specific mathematical framework developed in dialogue with Claude (Anthropic) in 2026. The framework is a two-track programme. Track 1 (Scale Space) is developed in Parts I–VI: the metric, geodesics, field equation, action, conservation laws, anda rigorous derivation of the Newtonian weak-field limit (Part I) ; quantum theory (Part II) ; biology (Part III) ; scale-extended objects (Part IV) ; related frameworksand distinctions (Part V) ; and the 5D parent theory and dynamical closure (Part VI). The geometry is an AdS-like (Riemannian, positive-definite) 4D space; mass causesmotion in s; gravity is the apparent effect of coherent s-motion on scale-stationary observers. Track 2 (CNRS) is developed in Part VII: a positional number systemin complex base z0 = −2 + i with digit alphabet 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 in which complex numbers are single digit strings, arithmetic is performed by finite automata, and theCNRS-H digit-shift realises ∂/∂ρ exactly. Part VIII traces the five specific contact points between the two tracks. The companion papers (Scale Space Papers 1–20, 23–24; CNRS papers) and the programme books (Across Scale: A Geometry of Size and Representation, forthcoming; Across Scale: Technical Companion, forthcoming) are indexed at https: //www. nul1. com and deposited on Zenodo.
Donald G. Palmer (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: