Mixed-methods study evaluates empowerment in adolescents, indicating areas for care improvement.
Objective To evaluate empowerment and quality of life (QOL) in adolescents (10 – 19 years of age) with chronic conditions and/or disabilities from neurology and orthopedic clinics and identify areas to improve their care and empowerment. Study design We utilized a mixed methods design with an explanatory sequential approach. Participants were recruited from neurology and orthopedic clinics at BC Children’s Hospital and completed a demographic survey and two validated online tools: The Gothenburg Young Person’s Empowerment Scale (GYPES) and Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL TM ) self-report. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of adolescents’ feelings of empowerment. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify demographic variables associated with decreased empowerment and QOL. Interviews were analysed using an interpretive description framework. Results Forty-eight participants completed the survey. The mean reported GYPES and PedsQL TM scores were 58.15 + 8.46 and 61.57 + 22.32 respectively. Theoretical sufficiency was reached after 14 interviews. Four environmental factors leading to feelings promoting empowerment were identified: 1) shared decision-making enabled advocacy and independence, 2) education (particularly involving genetics) increased knowledge and understanding, 3) sharing stories led to empowering others, 4) participation in physical activities promoted a sense of belonging. Conclusions This study was the first to use the GYPES in adolescents with diverse disabilities and/or chronic conditions from neurology and orthopedic clinics. Adolescents felt empowered when they were actively involved in their health care and informed about the genetics of their diagnosis. Participants also wanted opportunities to empower others going through similar experiences. This study emphasizes the need for access to genetic counselling and opportunities for shared expression to facilitate empowerment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Austin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: