Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of central adiposity, sex and age, on the association between total-animal and total-plant based protein and the 20-year cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D), among apparently healthy adults participating in the ATTICA cohort study (2002-2022). METHODS: The present analysis included data from 2,000 individuals free of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and T2D at baseline (age 43 ± 13 years; 51% women). Total, animal-based, and plant-based protein intake were measured, through a validated food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: The 20-year cumulative incidence of T2D was 26.3% (95%CI [24.4, 28.3%]). Total red meat intake was consistently associated with increased incidence of T2D in both sexes, with RRs ranging from 1.08 to 1.11 per 30 g/day increment (p's < 0.05), after adjustment for confounders. Among females, a higher intake of animal-based protein was significantly associated with increased incidence of T2D (RR 1.24, 95%CI [1.04, 1.48]), with no significant associations among males. The adverse association between animal-based protein intake and T2D was strongest among females with increased WHR (RR 2.06, 95%CI [1.21, 3.49]); no significant association was observed in males, regardless of WHR status. Among younger females (< 65 years) with increased WHR, the association between animal-based protein and T2D incidence was equally strong (RR 2.06, 95%CI [1.21, 3.49]), and plant-based protein intake retained a highly significant protective association (RR 0.24, 95%CI [0.08, 0.68]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term animal protein intake, especially red meat, increases the likelihood of developing T2D, particularly in women with central obesity; plant protein appears protective in metabolically vulnerable subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kechagia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: