Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduce Ladhe, a compact hash-based authentication primitive whose private key is an ascending tuple of distinct odd primes summing to a public prime P, and whose public key is the hash of an indexed-pair compression of these primes. The one-time variant is a single-use commitment-and-opening: the public key commits to a secret witness; a signature opens the commitment alongside the message. We prove security against the natural No-Query Forgery (NQF) game — an adversary, given only the public key, cannot produce a valid signature — by reduction to preimage resistance of SHA-256 in the random oracle model. The NQF reduction uses an explicit oracle simulator with target embedding (Theorem 2). A multi-key analysis (Proposition 1) gives a tight union bound; we additionally treat non-uniform precomputation attacks via the Hellman tradeoff. Full EUF-CMA security is recovered in the many-time variant via standard Merkle aggregation that binds messages into leaf hashes, following the SPHINCS+ template [14]. The arithmetic structure of the private key enables compact one-time signatures (the primes themselves, no Merkle path) and a fast structural verifier (k primality checks plus a single hash evaluation). The reference parameter set targets NIST PQC Category 5 via SHA-256, with three measured operating points (|P|= 256, 512, and 1024 bits) trading KeyGen latency against signature footprint. We give the full construction, security analysis in the random oracle model with explicit bounds, an IANA-registered algorithm identifier (Private Enterprise Number 65644, registered April 2026), an open-source Python reference implementation, and a public cryptanalysis bounty. We do not claim machine-verified proofs in the style of Barbosa et al. [19]. We make explicit where our argument is informal and invite community engagement (formal verifica- tion, structural cryptanalysis, advisor review) prior to production use. Efficient KeyGen at cryptographic parameter sizes remains the principal open problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ladhe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: