Shows free influenza vaccination improves health outcomes and saves costs for older adults, indicating a needed policy shift.
OBJECTIVE: Vaccination serves as the most efficacious intervention to prevent influenza-related illness. The aim of this study was to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of a fully-funded trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) strategy for people aged 60 years and over. METHODS: A static decision-tree Markov model was employed to conduct a lifetime economic evaluation from a societal perspective. Model parameters such as probabilities, costs and utility values, were derived from regional health information platform, published literature, and investigation. The number of cases and deaths averted, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were predicted. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty of results. RESULTS: Compared with self-paid vaccination, the implementation of the free influenza vaccination program is projected to cumulatively reduce 261,374 non-medically attended influenza cases,370,155 outpatient influenza cases, 13,678 hospitalized influenza cases, and 1987 influenza-associated deaths. It is estimated that this programme will generate cumulative cost savings of $2,184,312 and an additional 14,324 QALYs, rendering it a dominant strategy. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one times of the per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of Ningbo, the probability of the programme being cost-effective is 99.88%. The threshold analysis revealed that the threshold price of TIV is $11.18 under the most conservative WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS: It has been demonstrated that the free influenza vaccination policy are cost-effective for the elderly individuals. The government and health authorities are supposed to implement and promote a universal free influenza vaccination programme for the elderly, with particular emphasis on the oldest age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: