Study optimizes energy allocation in zero-carbon systems, suggesting new strategies for renewable energy use.
Rapidly increasing electricity demands pose significant environmental threats due to high CO 2 emissions resulting from the use of non-renewable energy sources. Zero-carbon energy solutions, which rely entirely on renewable energy systems, represent a promising approach to addressing this challenge. However, complete reliance on renewable sources such as solar and wind energy remains difficult due to their intermittent and volatile nature. Consequently, most existing renewable energy solutions still incorporate diesel-based systems alongside renewable sources. In this work, we consider a zero-carbon energy system that utilizes solar energy in combination with an energy storage system and optimized demand scheduling. The proposed energy management policy leverages day-ahead solar forecasting to efficiently plan energy allocation in advance, ensuring that users’ energy demands are met throughout the day. For accurate hourly day-ahead energy prediction, we propose a computationally efficient hybrid RF–LSTM feature augmentation model that utilizes only historical solar irradiance observations. The proposed model achieves mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), normalized root mean square error (nRMSE), and normalized mean absolute error (nMAE) values of 15.99, 5.1%, and 2.1%, respectively. To manage energy allocation, we formulate the scheduling problem as a multi-objective Mixed Binary Integer Linear Program (MBILP), aiming to minimize (i) the mismatch between user demand and allocated energy, (ii) energy wastage, and (iii) scheduling delays for delay-sensitive devices, subject to battery charging/discharging constraints and storage capacity limits. We evaluate the proposed scheme under varying battery capacities and solar panel sizes. The results demonstrate that our approach improves demand satisfaction by approximately 23%, while ensuring battery safety and meeting demand threshold requirements throughout the day.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amjad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: