Non-doctrinal study assesses awareness of voting rights and electoral offenses in Maharashtra citizens, indicating a significant knowledge gap.
Indian democracy is based on the concept of the informed electorate. This non-dogmatic empirical study aims to assess citizen knowledge of their rights and electoral offenses, conducted using a questionnaire among 80 randomly chosen participants belonging to the urban, semi-urban, and rural population of Maharashtra. Based on a survey conducted during September–October 2025, an ironic contradiction becomes evident: although voter registration (91.25%) and participation in the election process (88.75%) are rather high, legal literacy is poor indeed. Just 1.25% of the interviewees knew what NOTA stands for; only 41.25% knew when the Model Code of Conduct starts operating; and 95% of people who witnessed an electoral offense did not report this fact to law enforcement agencies. Thus, the main hypothesis of this paper is confirmed, as there is undoubtedly a huge gap between the legal aspects of the electoral process in India and the level of public awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yash Sharad More (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: