Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guidelines facilitate evidence-based cut-off scoring in diagnostics, ensuring balanced sensitivity and specificity.
Determining ideal cut-off scores is a critical step in screening and diagnostic test evaluation. While the Area Under the Curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve are frequently reported, these do not directly indicate the best threshold for decision-making. In addition, pursuing an optimal solution might not always be practical. This paper presents a practical guideline for selecting cut-off scores based on AUC values in conjunction with sensitivity, specificity, and intended scientific use. The study outline recommended strategies for different AUC ranges, incorporating realistic considerations and scientific priorities. The framework offers flexibility, including when to prioritize sensitivity, specificity, or balanced performance via Youden's Index and other techniques. This guideline aims to support researchers and clinicians in making evidence-based, transparent, and context-sensitive decisions when interpreting screening or diagnostic accuracy results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamad Adam Bujang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: