Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines fungal genome relations, focusing on mango production impact, indicating significant genomic insights.
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is one of the most economically important tropical fruit crops worldwide, with increasing relevance in Latin America for both fresh consumption and export markets (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2021; Kaur et al., 2023). Its production is significantly affected by fungal diseases, particularly post-harvest stem-end rot and fruit rot, which reduce shelf life and commercial value (Gariba et al., 2025;Guirado-Manzano et al., 2024;Lomavatu et al., 2024;Navarro et al., 2022). Members of the family Botryosphaeriaceae, including species of Neofusicoccum, are frequently associated with these diseases in mango-producing regions across Asia, Africa, Oceania, and the Americas (Coutinho et al., 2018;Li et al., 2021;Phillips et al., 2013;Sakalidis et al., 2011;Vecchio et al., 2025).Among them, Neofusicoccum parvum is recognized as an opportunist pathogen capable of causing dieback, stem canker, and fruit rot in mango and other woody hosts. This species can persist as a latent endophyte and transition to a pathogenic phase under host stress conditions, complicating disease management and epidemiological assessments (Castaño-Tarazona et al., 2025;Hernández et al., 2023;Marques et al., 2013;Slippers and Wingfield, 2007). Accurate identification of Botryosphaeriaceae species is challenging due to morphological similarity and the presence of cryptic species complexes. Molecular markers such as the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region are widely used for initial taxonomic assignment, although whole-genome data provide higher resolution for species delimitation and comparative analyses (Deng et al., 2025;Sakalidis et al., 2013;Schoch et al., 2012).Despite the cultural and economic importance of mango production in Paraguay, genomic resources for fungal pathogens associated with mango diseases in the country are currently lacking. Here, we report the first whole-genome draft sequence of N. parvum, obtained from a strain isolated from symptomatic mango fruits collected in the Central Department of Paraguay. The assembled and annotated genome provides a reference resource for future comparative, epidemiological, and pathogenicity-related studies of Botryosphaeriaceae in the region.This dataset contributes to the genomic characterization of N. parvum by providing, to our knowledge, the first draft assembly for this species isolated in Paraguay. While 27 N. parvum genome records were previously available in the NCBI database, this study increases the total to 28 and represents only the second isolate from mango worldwide, highlighting the importance of expanding host-specific genomic resources. Given that N. parvum is a significant causal agent of fruit rot and dieback in mango (Guirado-Manzano et al., 2024;Aiello et al., 2022), these data offer a foundational resource to investigate the genetic basis of its pathogenicity. Such information is essential for the refinement of molecular diagnostic tools and the development of effective management strategies to minimize post-harvest damage in the region.The fungal isolate F1OG was recovered from a symptomatic mango fruit (M. indica L.) collected in Luque, Paraguay (25°17'58.5"S 57°30'29.7"W), on November 30, 2025. The specimen displayed characteristic symptoms of fungal infection, including dark lesions, necrotic areas, and scaly tissue. For isolation, tissue fragments were excised from the transition zone between healthy and symptomatic areas. Surface sterilization was performed by rinsing the fruits with tap water, followed by immersion in 4% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes and multiple rinses with sterile distilled water. The fragments were plated onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (100 mg/L) and incubated at 25°C. Homogeneous cultures were obtained through repeated subculturing. To confirm pathogenicity, healthy mango fruits were inoculated with isolate F1OG, and the pathogen was subsequently re-isolated, successfully fulfilling Koch's postulates (Fredricks and Relman, 1996).Isolate F1OG was grown on PDA for 10 days. Mycelia were harvested by surface scraping, and total genomic DNA was extracted using the HiMedia HiPurA™ HP Fungal DNA Purification Kit, following the manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing libraries were constructed using the TruSeq Nano DNA kit (350 bp insert size). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq X platform, generating 151 bp paired-end reads.Raw read quality was assessed using FastQC v0.11.9 (Andrews, 2010). De novo assembly was performed with SPAdes v3.15 (Prjibelski et al., 2020). To enhance structural continuity, the resulting contigs were scaffolded using RagTag v2.1.0 (Alonge et al., 2022), employing the Complete Genome assembly of N. parvum DUCC19944 (NCBI Accession: GCA_020912385.1), originally isolated from a pear tree, as a reference. For the reference genome DUCC19944, which lacked prior annotation, gene prediction was performed using Augustus v3.5.0 (Stanke et al., 2006) via the Galaxy Europe platform (The Galaxy Community et al., 2024).Structural annotation was carried out using the Funannotate v1.8 pipeline (Palmer and Stajich, 2020). Ab initio gene prediction was supported by GeneMark-EP (Brůna et al., 2020), integrated under a non-commercial license. Prior to annotation, the assembly was pre-processed with the funannotate clean utility to remove redundant contigs and scaffolds shorter than 1,000 bp. Evidence-based alignment was performed using the N. parvum NSSI1 assembly (GCA_030270365.1), isolated from M. indica.Functional characterization and protein domain identification were executed using InterProScan v5.59 (Jones et al., 2014) and eggNOG-mapper v2.1.13 with the eggNOG database v5.0.2 (Huerta-Cepas et al., 2019;Cantalapiedra et al., 2021) on the Galaxy Europe platform (The Galaxy Community et al., 2024). Non-coding RNA elements, including tRNAs and rRNAs, were identified using tRNAscan-SE (Lowe and Eddy, 1997) and Barrnap v1.7 (Seemann, 2026), respectively. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were predicted using the fungal version of antiSMASH v8.0 (Blin et al., 2025). Final GFF integration and ASN.1 (.sqn) file generation were validated using the NCBI table2asn utility v1.29.324.Assembly quality and completeness were evaluated using QUAST v5.3 (Mikheenko et al., 2023) andBUSCO v6.0 (Tegenfeldt et al., 2025) against the ascomycota_odb12 lineage. Synteny and structural correlations between F1OG and the reference genome were visualized using D-GENIES (Cabanettes and Klopp, 2018), while a circular genomic map was constructed with Circos v0.69-8 (Krzywinski et al., 2009). The repetitive landscape was characterized using RepeatMasker v4.2.3 (Smit and Hubley, 2025) against the Dfam 3.9 database (Storer et al., 2021).For evolutionary context, a phylogenomic tree was constructed using Buscogeny v2.1.0 (Webster and Chapman, 2026) based on single-copy orthologs. Botryosphaeria dothidea was selected as an outgroup. The analysis included representative genomes of N. laricinum, N. kwambonambiense, N. cordaticola, and N. ribis, alongside 27 N. parvum genomes available in NCBI. Phylogenetic inference was performed with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. The final tree was visualized and styled using iTOL v6 (Letunic and Bork, 2024).To evaluate pathogenic potential, signal peptides were predicted using SignalP v6.0 (Teufel et al., 2022). To refine the secretome, TMHMM v2.0 (Krogh et al., 2001) was employed to exclude membrane-bound proteins. This analysis was conducted on the Galaxy Europe platform (The Galaxy Community et al., 2024). The secretome was further analyzed for Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZymes) using the run_dbcan v4.1.4 (Zheng et al., 2023) pipeline against the dbCAN3 database. Fungal effectors were predicted using EffectorP-fungi v3.0 (Sperschneider and Dodds, 2022). Data processing and visualization were conducted in Python 3.12.13 using pandas v2.2.2 (The pandas development team, 2026), NumPy v2.0.2 (Harris et al., 2020), Matplotlib v3.10.0 (Hunter, 2007), and Seaborn v0.13.2 (Waskom, 2021).The genome assembly of N. parvum F1OG consists of 177 scaffolds (≥1,000 bp) with a total size of 44,097,814 bp and an average sequencing depth of 30× (Table 1). The assembly exhibits marked syntenic conservation with the reference genome (Fig. 1A) and is characterized by an N50 of 2,508,510 bp, an L50 of 7, and a largest scaffold of 4,396,550 bp. The GC content is 56.43%, consistent with other members of the Botryosphaeriaceae family. Genomic completeness, assessed via BUSCO, reached 99.10%, with 98.70% of genes identified as complete single copy orthologs and a total repetitive content of 2.15%.Structural annotation identified 13,103 genes, including 13,054 protein-coding sequences (CDS), 15 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and 34 transfer RNAs (tRNAs). The spatial distribution of these features is visualized in the circular genomic map (Fig. 1B). With the inclusion of F1OG, 28 N. parvum assemblies are currently available in the NCBI database (Supplementary Table S1); however, F1OG represents only the fourth genome with detailed gene annotations, alongside strains PPO83 (isolated from Tetrapanax papyrifer), NSSI1 (from M. indica), and UCRNP2(from Vitis vinifera). Notably, F1OG is the first genome of this species reported from Paraguay and the second isolated from M. indica L. worldwide.Phylogenomic inference based on single copy orthologs confirmed that F1OG clusters strictly within the N. parvum core clade, clearly resolving it from the N. parvum/N. ribis species complex (Fig. 2A). Although the reference genome used for RagTag scaffolding (DUCC19944) provides a robust structural framework due to its hybrid assembly (Illumina and PacBio), the study isolate exhibited a greater phylogenetic affinity to N. parvum CBS 123649.The secretome profiles of F1OG and related isolates reveal a conserved investment in virulence factors (Fig. 2B). F1OG maintains a robust repertoire of CAZymes, including 197 Glycoside Hydrolases (GH), 105 Auxiliary Activities (AA), 36 Carbohydrate Esterases (CE), and 25 Pectate Lyases (PL) (Fig. 2C). This enzymatic diversity underscores its potent capacity for plant cell wall degradation.Analysis of secondary metabolism identified conserved biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for mellein and clavaric acid across all compared strains (Fig. 2D). Interestingly, F1OG harbors a patulin BGC identified with medium confidence, based on a cluster similarity threshold of 50-75%. This feature is absent in the other mango-derived isolate (NSSI1) and shows only low confidence in DUCC19944, but is shared with the virulent strain PPO83. These results suggest that N. parvum isolates exhibit subtle variations in their secondary metabolic potential. Overall, this dataset provides a genomic and functional blueprint of N. parvum F1OG, demonstrating substantial consistency with established reference lineage.While the N. parvum F1OG assembly provides a comprehensive genomic resource with substantial gene-level completeness, it is important to note that the use of Illumina short-read technology and reference-guided scaffolding is optimized for sequence accuracy and synteny assessment. This approach, while robust for functional genomics and comparative studies, may not fully capture the complete landscape of repetitive regions or large-scale structural variations that could be unique to this regional isolate. Consequently, this draft genome serves as a reliable baseline for current epidemiological and pathogenic research in the region, while providing a foundation for future refinements using complementary long-read sequencing technologies.The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are publicly available in the NCBI database under the following accessions: BioProject ID: PRJNA1420210; Genome Assembly accession: GCA_056114585.1; BioSample ID: SAMN55211723; and Sequence Read Archive (SRA): SRR37154756. This research was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología del Paraguay (CONACYT), grant number INIC01-219 "Caracterización microbiológica y molecular de agentes patógenos encontrados en frutos de mango (Mangifera indica) provenientes del departamento Central".We thank the Freiburg Galaxy Team and Björn Grüning (Bioinformatics, University of Freiburg, Germany) for providing access to bioinformatics tools. Tegenfeldt, F., Kuznetsov, D., Manni, M., Berkeley, M., Zdobnov, E. M., and Kriventseva, E. V.(2025). OrthoDB and BUSCO update: annotation of orthologs with wider sampling of genomes.Nucleic Acids Research 53, D516-D522. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae987 Teufel, F., Almagro Armenteros, J. J., Johansen, A. R., Gíslason, M. H., Pihl, S. I., Tsirigos, K. D., et al. (2022). SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol 40, 1023-1025. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3The Galaxy Community, Abueg, L. A. L., Afgan, E., Allart, O., Awan, A. H., Bacon, W. A., et al. (2024). The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Research 52, W83-W94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410The pandas development team (2026). pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.3509134 Vecchio, L., Vitale, A., Aiello, D., Di Pietro, C., Parafati, L., and Polizzi, G. (2025) Specifically, cluster similarity was categorized as high (≥ 75%), medium (50-75%), and low (15-50%), while similarities below 15% were not considered significant and are excluded from the overview. A value of 0 was assigned to clusters not present in a given strain. The heatmap highlights the presence of the patulin cluster in strain F1OG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: