Evaluates Al substitution's effect on solar cell efficiency in thin films, suggesting optimal composition for performance.
Achieving high performance efficiency of copper zinc tin sulphide (CZTS) thin film solar cells is a challenging issue, mainly hindered by a large open circuit-voltage deficit ( V OC ) owing in large part to the presence of various Cu–Zn related defects and associated non-radiative recombination. Cation substitution at the Zn site offers a promising route to suppress these defects and engineer the optoelectronic properties of the absorber layer. In this work, we present the first systematic study of partial Zn-site substitution by Al across a wide compositional range (0 < x < 0.75) in Cu 2 (Zn, Al)SnS 4 (CZATS) thin films deposited by the low-cost and scalable ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy confirmed the formation of the kesterite phase across all compositions, with structural degradation emerging at x = 0.75. The optical band gap decreases progressively from 1.51 eV to 1.25 eV with increasing Al content, a trend mechanistically linked to growing lattice microstrain and enhanced band tailing. Electrically, hole mobility improves substantially as x increases from 0 to 0.5, consistent with grain growth and suppression of donor-type intrinsic defects, before deteriorating sharply at x = 0.75 due to increased dislocation density. Furthermore, the numerical analysis of the photovoltaic performance of CZATS solar cells using one-dimensional solar cell capacitance simulator with experimentally measured data revealed that the highest simulated power conversion efficiency is achieved at the composition x = 0.25, demonstrating the benefit of moderate Al substitution for photovoltaic performance. These results establish an optimal substitution window ( x = 0.25−0.5) and provide a physically coherent framework linking Al content, kesterite defect chemistry, and solar cell performance, offering a practical and scalable pathway toward higher-efficiency CZTS devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: