Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates assistive device use impact on informal caregiving hours in older adults, suggesting no significant association.
Objective: To investigate whether assistive device (AD) use within the past 12 months (self-reported at baseline) affects the change in the amount of informal caregiving hours received over time (three-years), among community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years) in comparison to those who did not use AD at all. Methods: Data from the Tracking (n = 236) and Comprehensive (n = 420) cohorts of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Ageing (CLSA) were analysed using multiple linear regression models to regress the changes in the amount of informal caregiving hours received (follow-up - baseline) on AD use (yes/no) while accounting for a set of sociodemographic, health, functionality, psychological, and support covariates. Results: We did not find significant associations between AD use and changes in the amount of informal care hours received among older adults (Tracking cohort:β̂= 3.10, 95% CI = −77.98 to 84.17; Comprehensive cohort:β̂= −5.05, 95% CI = −47.19 to 37.09). Conclusions: Our results did not provide sufficient evidence for an association between AD use and informal caregiver time. Future studies addressing this issue should employ longer follow-up periods, analyse by device type, and obtain caregiving hours directly from informal caregivers. Nonetheless, these findings remain valuable for informing future research directions, prompting re-examination of existing theories, and guiding evidence-based policy and practice decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marasinghe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: