Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic study investigates variance in linear attention performance with kernel parameters and position encoding.
We present a systematic empirical study of a linear-complexity attention operator (CubeAttn B+) that replaces the cross-token attention matrix with a lightweight global aggregation mechanism. Our investigation spans four rounds of experiments with increasing rigor, including 275+ new trained models and three position-encoding interventions. We report findings with methodological implications: (1) a U-shaped kernel failure curve shows intermediate convolution kernels (k=5-11) cause systematic collapse while k=3 and k=15 perform well; (2) 5-seed validation reveals single-seed results are fundamentally unreliable, with Long-Range Recall overestimated by up to 50%; (3) a diagnostic-driven design cycle testing RoPE-based and per-layer absolute position encoding interventions converges on a single architectural constraint: the V-aggregation + feature-dim softmax design averages away per-position information, making absolute position binding structurally impossible without changes to the aggregation mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yahua Ruan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: