Telemonitoring interventions in patients with heart failure showed heterogeneous results, with some trials demonstrating reduced hospitalizations but most reporting no clear difference in hospitalization or mortality compared with usual care.
Systematic Review (n=8,011)
Do telemonitoring interventions reduce hospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure?
Telemonitoring in heart failure shows predominantly neutral effects on hospitalization and mortality, highlighting the need for standardized intervention strategies to identify patients most likely to benefit.
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition associated with high rates of hospitalization and mortality. Telemonitoring has emerged as a potential strategy to improve patient outcomes; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring interventions with usual care in patients with HF. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between January 2010 and December 2025. The final literature search was performed in January 2026. Eligible studies included RCTs reporting hospitalization and/or mortality outcomes associated with telemonitoring interventions. A total of 12 RCTs were included. Telemonitoring interventions demonstrated substantial heterogeneity and included remote patient monitoring systems, implantable cardiac device-based monitoring, telerehabilitation, and remote-guided therapy optimization. Several studies demonstrated reduced hospitalization compared with usual care; however, most studies reported neutral hospitalization outcomes. Regarding mortality, only a limited number of studies reported benefit, whereas most studies demonstrated no clear difference compared with usual care. Overall, telemonitoring may provide supportive benefit in selected patients with HF, although findings remain heterogeneous and predominantly neutral, particularly regarding mortality outcomes. Further well-designed studies with standardized intervention strategies are needed to better define the patient populations most likely to benefit.
Neiloofar Mohmand (Sat,) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure (n=8,011). Telemonitoring vs. Usual care was evaluated on Hospitalization and mortality. Telemonitoring interventions in patients with heart failure showed heterogeneous results, with some trials demonstrating reduced hospitalizations but most reporting no clear difference in hospitalization or mortality compared with usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: