Demonstrates avian everyday activism in urban environments, highlighting birds' negotiations for space and rights.
Humans constantly take space from birds, who themselves relentlessly try to make place. By looking at specific cases of humans’ interactions with wild, feral, liminal, domesticated birds in human-dominated environments, we observe attempts to negotiate life and place, where birds claim rights: nesting in buildings, repurposing bird spikes, stealing food waste … Following the idea that social sciences should move “beyond-the-human”, I propose to frame these negotiations as political, and to look at them as “avian everyday activism”. Re-branding these negotiations opens the perspective that birds express their claims through tactics akin to “everyday resistance”. Doing so, I reveal how to conceive differently animal and multispecies politics, one where birds, and by extension other animals, can express directly their claims, rather than through humans voicing them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Théophile Robert-Rimsky (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: