Prospective cohort study identifies saccadic analysis as a superior method for detecting MCI in elderly surgical patients, suggesting enhanced preoperative assessments.
Background This study aimed to identify the optimal method for detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in elderly knee/hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients, a vulnerable group at high risk for postoperative delirium, by comparing neuropsychological tests, molecular biomarkers, and saccadic eye movements. Methods In this prospective cohort study, 316 patients (≥65 years) scheduled for knee/hip arthroplasty underwent preoperative assessments using neuropsychological tests (MMSE, MoCA, CDR), blood/CSF molecular analysis, and saccadic tasks. Participants were classified as MCI ( n = 90) or non-MCI ( n = 226) by geriatricians based on standard diagnostic criteria. Results No significant molecular differences were found between MCI and non-MCI patients. While MMSE, MoCA, and CDR scores were significantly lower in the MCI group, saccadic parameters showed superior diagnostic accuracy. A model based on saccades achieved an AUROC of 0.90, outperforming the MMSE model (AUROC = 0.85). Conclusions Saccadic analysis outperformed standard cognitive screening and molecular tests in detecting MCI, indicating its potential as a superior, non-invasive preoperative assessment tool. Trial number The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200062483, August 8, 2022).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: