Key result
Cilostazol improves one-year GFR slope by ~6 mL/min/year vs aspirin alone in advanced CKD.
Why the study?
Cilostazol has antiplatelet and vasodilatory properties that may offer renoprotective and cardiovascular benefits, but its effects in patients with advanced CKD remain unclear.
Does cilostazol plus aspirin slow renal function decline and improve long-term prognosis in patients with advanced CKD compared to aspirin alone?
RCT (n=12)
Open-label
Alternating assignment
No
Does cilostazol plus aspirin slow renal function decline and improve long-term prognosis in patients with advanced CKD compared to aspirin alone?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.03% vs -3.86%
p-value: p=0.002
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
In a small pilot study of patients with advanced CKD, adding cilostazol to aspirin slowed the annual decline in estimated GFR and was associated with fewer long-term cardiovascular events.
Background Cilostazol has antiplatelet and vasodilatory properties and may provide renoprotective and cardiovascular benefits; however, its effects in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain unclear. Methods This prospective pilot study enrolled 12 patients with advanced CKD due to nephrosclerosis (7 men, 5 women; mean age 65.3 ± 11.0 years). Patients were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol 200 mg/day plus aspirin 100 mg/day (Group C, n = 6) or aspirin 100 mg/day alone (Group A, n = 6). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured using inulin and para-aminohippuric acid clearance at baseline and after 1 year. Renal outcomes and complications were evaluated, followed by long-term observation until initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Results Baseline GFR and RPF were comparable between groups. After 1 year, GFR increased in 4 of 6 patients in Group C but declined in all patients in Group A. Mean GFR decreased significantly in Group A but not in Group C. Although estimated GFR declined in both groups, the annual rate of decline was significantly slower in Group C than in Group A (− 2.72 vs. − 3.84 mL/min/1.73 m 2 /year). RPF and urinary protein levels showed no significant changes in either group. Over a mean follow-up of 6.7 years, RRT was initiated in 2 patients in Group C and 4 in Group A. Two cerebral infarctions occurred in Group A, whereas no cardiovascular events occurred in Group C. Conclusion Cilostazol may slow short-term renal function decline and offer long-term cardiovascular protection in patients with advanced CKD. Further studies are needed to determine its role in preventing long-term renal deterioration.
Saito et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD stages G3 and G4) (n=12). Cilostazol plus aspirin vs. Aspirin 100 mg/day alone was evaluated on Change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope at 1 year (mL/min/1.73 m2/year) (p=0.002). Cilostazol significantly improved the 1-year glomerular filtration rate slope compared to aspirin alone (+2.03 vs -3.86 mL/min/1.73 m2/year) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: