Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the performance of a nonlinear energy sink in reducing vibrations in wind turbines, suggesting improved resilience.
Monopile offshore wind turbines are vulnerable to excessive vibration under coupled wind, wave, and seismic loading because of their slender and flexible structural characteristics. This study investigates a single-sided vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink (SSVI NES) installed inside the nacelle of a 5 MW monopile offshore wind turbine. A reduced-order ten-degree-of-freedom dynamic model is established using the Euler-Lagrange formulation, and turbulent wind, irregular wave, and seismic inputs are generated using TurbSim, the Kaimal and JONSWAP spectra, the Morison equation, and 15 PEER ground-motion records. The proposed SSVI NES is compared with an optimized tuned mass damper (TMD) under nominal and frequency-detuned conditions. Under the nominal design condition, the optimized TMD and the representative SSVI NES reduce the RMS nacelle fore-aft displacement by approximately 55% and 50%, respectively, indicating that the SSVI NES provides near-benchmark vibration mitigation. Meanwhile, the maximum absorber stroke of the SSVI NES is reduced by approximately 40% compared with that of the optimized TMD, which is beneficial for nacelle-integrated implementation. Under frequency detuning, the response-reduction effectiveness of the TMD decreases from approximately 55% to 20%, whereas the SSVI NES retains approximately 80% of its nominal RMS-based control effectiveness. These quantified results show that the SSVI NES offers a balanced combination of competitive nominal response reduction, reduced absorber motion demand, and improved robustness against structural-frequency variations. The proposed device therefore provides a promising passive-control strategy for enhancing the serviceability and multi-hazard resilience of monopile offshore wind turbines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maimaiti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: