Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis examines vitamin D's association with iron status among women, suggesting important implications for nutrient interaction.
Vitamin D and iron deficiencies are highly prevalent globally, with evidence of a complex interaction (1) . However, the extent to which these micronutrients interact, and whether this changes according to age and sex, remains uncertain. Understanding the association between vitamin D and iron could help address these nutrient insufficiencies concurrently, rather than as two independent public health concerns. The aim of this study was to determine the association between vitamin D (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D)) and iron (haemoglobin and ferritin) status in men and women of reproductive age. Secondary analysis of Years 9-11 (2016/17-2018/19) of the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Rolling Programme was conducted. Concentrations of blood biomarkers in adults aged 19-49 years were compared to UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) guidance. Spearman’s bivariate correlations were performed to investigate associations between vitamin D and iron status using IBM SPSS Statistics (2024). Descriptive analyses found the percentage of men and women with serum 25(OH)D concentrations below the SACN threshold for increased risk of deficiency (<25nmol/L) (2) , were 18.4% and 17.9%, respectively. Moreover, 62.0% of men and 49.8% of women had insufficient 25(OH)D concentrations (<50nmol/L). For ferritin, 17.0% of women had concentrations below the 15µg/L deficiency threshold, compared to 0.0% of men (3) . Similarly, for haemoglobin, 8.7% of women were below the 120g/L diagnostic deficiency threshold compared to 2.3% of men (<130g/L) (3) . Haemoglobin (g/L) and 25(OH)D (nmol/L) concentrations were not associated in men (rs(172)=-0.019, p=0.802) or women (rs(244)=0.034, p=0.595). However, despite no association found between ferritin (µg/L) and 25(OH)D (nmol/L) in men (rs(175)=-0.022, p=0.766), a significant correlation was observed in women (rs(259)=0.184, p=0.003), albeit with a small effect size. Furthermore, a Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference when comparing median ferritin concentrations by vitamin D status (deficient <25.00nmol/L; insufficient 25-49.99nmol/L; replete ≥50nmol/L) in women (H(2)=8.888, p=0.012). Post-hoc testing revealed no significant difference between ferritin concentrations in women classified as deficient or insufficient (p=0.687 – Bonferroni correction p=1.000), whereas, there was a significant difference between the ferritin concentrations of women who were vitamin D deficient and replete (p=0.015 – Bonferroni correction p=0.046), or insufficient and replete (p=0.015 – Bonferroni correction p=0.046). A significant correlation was found between 25(OH)D and ferritin concentrations in women; moreover, a significant difference was identified when comparing ferritin concentrations by vitamin D status. No associations were found between haemoglobin and 25(OH)D concentrations. In conclusion, these results suggest a potential association between vitamin D and iron status; and that vitamin D adequacy or deficiency/insufficiency may influence concentrations of ferritin, as a marker of iron, and/or vice versa. To further explore these associations between vitamin D and iron status, further analysis will adjust ferritin concentrations by C-reactive protein concentrations and investigate whether seasonality influences observed associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: