Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals improved predictive performance in electrical fire risk assessment, indicating enhanced monitoring capabilities.
Accurate prediction of electrical fire risk is important for early warning, but real-world monitoring data are often affected by sensor noise, transient anomalies, and non-Gaussian interference. This study proposes an HL-Transformer that incorporates an HL-Pooling layer based on the Hodges–Lehmann estimator into the Transformer feature aggregation process. The HL-Pooling layer replaces conventional mean- or max-based pooling by using the median of pairwise averages, aiming to suppress abnormal perturbations while preserving temporal information. Experiments were conducted on a real-world electrical fire monitoring dataset and the public ETTh1 dataset, with additional robustness tests under different outlier ratios and intensities. The results show that, within the same Transformer backbone, HL-Transformer reduced the MSE by 75.4% compared with the Max-Pooling variant and achieved an R2 of 0.879 on the electrical fire risk prediction task. Under injected outliers, the HL-Pooling layer showed more stable error trends, and its transfer to TCN, CNN-LSTM, and 1D-CNN models further improved predictive performance. These findings indicate that HL-Pooling is a robust and portable alternative to conventional pooling for time-series forecasting in noisy monitoring environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: