Randomized trial demonstrates optimal simulation of powdered fertilizer flow and lump breakage, improving application performance.
Powdered organic fertilizer is crucial for sustainable agriculture, but its poor flowability and hygroscopic compaction and caking nature cause frequent blockages during mechanized strip application. While a single Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) discrete element method (DEM) model simulates powder flow well, it fails to reflect the mechanical breakage of hard caked lumps. Thus, this study established a comprehensive DEM model simultaneously simulating both powder and caked lumps. Based on coarse-graining theory, 0.147 mm particles were scaled to 2 mm spheres. Contact parameters (e.g., JKR surface energy) were calibrated using response surface methodology, yielding a repose angle simulation error of only 0.18%. The actual three-dimensional (3D) geometry of caked lumps was reconstructed via 3D scanning, and breakage mechanical parameters were accurately calibrated by combining uniaxial compression tests with a Bonding model (errors for ultimate load and displacement < 2%). Applying this model to an anti-blocking fertilizer discharge device, simulations and performance tests demonstrated an acceptable macroscopic representation of both powder flow and lump breakage. The optimized device achieved a strip application uniformity coefficient of variation of 3.87–6.40%. By simulating the complex coexistence of powder flow and lump breakage, this study provides a feasible parameter calibration method and numerical reference for optimizing anti-blocking discharge devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: