Review analyzes passive cooling strategies for thermal comfort in buildings across hot–humid climates, suggesting valuable design guidance.
Buildings in hot–humid climates experience increasing thermal stress due to urban heat islands and climate change, leading to greater reliance on air conditioning. Passive cooling is therefore a crucial low-carbon strategy for maintaining thermal comfort. This paper reviews thermal comfort ranges and passive-cooling techniques across Köppen–Geiger hot–humid climate classes. A two-stage approach was adopted: thermal comfort data from 35 field studies were analyzed by climate class and ventilation mode, while more than 70 application studies were qualitatively reviewed to assess mechanisms, performance, and climate suitability. The results indicate that occupants in hot–humid areas exhibit broad thermal tolerance, particularly in naturally ventilated buildings, with neutral temperatures ranging from 19.5 °C in humid subtropical climates to 36.3 °C in tropical savanna climates. Natural ventilation is the most widely applicable passive-cooling strategy, but its effectiveness depends on integration with climate-responsive measures. Ventilation, combined with solar protection and courtyards, is most effective in Af and Am climates, whereas shading, solar chimneys, evaporative cooling, night ventilation, thermal mass, and phase-change materials provide greater benefits in Aw, Cfa, and Cwa climates. However, no single strategy is sufficient across all climates. The review provides climate-specific guidance for designing low-carbon, thermally resilient buildings in hot–humid regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Binarti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: