Key result
Advanced imaging techniques, including 3D echocardiography, CMR, and CT, overcome the limitations of conventional echocardiography to provide comprehensive assessment of right ventricular function.
Why the study?
Non-invasive assessment of the right ventricle is challenging due to complex anatomy and location, and conventional echocardiography has well-recognised limitations.
How do advanced imaging techniques compare to conventional echocardiography for the assessment of right ventricular anatomy and function?
How do advanced imaging techniques compare to conventional echocardiography for the assessment of right ventricular anatomy and function?
Advanced imaging techniques provide superior, quantitative assessment of right ventricular geometry and function compared to conventional echocardiography, despite specific modality limitations.
Right ventricular (RV) size and function are important predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with various conditions. However, non-invasive assessment of the RV is a challenging task due to its complex anatomy and location in the chest. Although conventional echocardiography is widely used, its limitations in RV assessment are well recognised. New techniques such as three-dimensional and speckle tracking echocardiography have overcome the limitations of conventional echocardiography allowing a comprehensive, quantitative assessment of RV geometry and function without geometric assumptions. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and CT provide accurate assessment of RV geometry and function, too. In addition, tissue characterisation imaging for myocardial scar and fat using CMR and CT provides important information regarding the RV that has clinical applications for diagnosis and prognosis in a broad range of cardiac conditions. Limitations also exist for these two advanced modalities including availability and patient suitability for CMR and need for contrast and radiation exposure for CT. Hybrid imaging, which is able to integrate anatomical information (usually obtained by CT or CMR) with physiological and molecular data (usually obtained with positron emission tomography), can provide optimal in vivo evaluation of Rv functional impairment. This review summarises the clinically useful applications of advanced echocardiography techniques, CMR and CT for comprehensive assessment of RV size, function and mechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badano et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiac conditions. Advanced imaging techniques (3D echocardiography, CMR, CT) vs. Conventional echocardiography was evaluated. Advanced imaging techniques, including 3D echocardiography, CMR, and CT, overcome the limitations of conventional echocardiography to provide comprehensive assessment of right ventricular function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: