Key result
Sugammadex significantly shortened the time to reach 90% train-of-four compared to 2.5 mg and 5 mg neostigmine (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does sugammadex reduce the time to achieve 90% TOF compared to neostigmine in patients with BMI >40 undergoing elective gastric sleeve surgery?
RCT (n=110)
Randomized
Does sugammadex reduce the time to achieve 90% TOF compared to neostigmine in patients with BMI >40 undergoing elective gastric sleeve surgery?
p-value: p=<0.05
Sugammadex provides faster reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade than neostigmine in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric sleeve surgery.
Sugammadex enables faster neuromuscular recovery in morbidly obese patients; confirms RCT superiority over neostigmine in gastric sleeve surgery.
Background and Aim: The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to compare the quality of reversal of rocuronium with either sugammadex (SUG) versus 2.5 mg or 5 mg neostigmine (NEO). Patients and Methods: A total of 110 patients with body mass index >40 underwent elective gastric sleeve surgery were enrolled in this study. Exclusion criteria included patients with co-existing muscular and cardiovascular diseases. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: group A (SUG), Group B (NEO 2.5 mg), and Group C (NEO 5 mg). General anesthesia was induced in the three groups using propofol 2.0 mg/kg of corrected body weight (CBW) and fentanyl 3 mcg/kg of CBW. Anesthesia was maintained with O 2 /air/desflurane 1 minimum alveolar concentration. Remifentanil infusion started at 0.05–0.2 mcg/kg/min. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg of CBW guided with PNS. When the train of four (TOF) reached zero, intubation was performed using a GlideScope. At the end of surgery, TOF ratio and posttetanic counts were recorded. SUG 2 mg/kg of CBW (Group A), NEO 2.5 mg (Group B), and NEO 5 mg (Group C) were administered according to the random envelope. The time to achieve 90% of TOF was recorded in seconds using a timer. ANOVA for repeated measurements was used for statistical analyses. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was a positive correlation ( P < 0.05) between the duration of surgery and the time to reach 90% of TOF in all the three groups. The time to reach 90% TOF was significantly shorter with Group A versus Groups B and C ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Although SUG proved to be faster than NEO 5 mg in attaining TOF >90%, the recovery pattern of both was similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Saeed et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Gastric sleeve surgery (n=110). Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine 2.5 mg or 5 mg was evaluated on Time to achieve 90% of train of four (TOF) (p=<0.05). Sugammadex significantly shortened the time to reach 90% train-of-four compared to 2.5 mg and 5 mg neostigmine (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: