Prospective cohort study investigates physical activity post-Achilles tendon rupture, highlighting implications on health outcomes.
Background This study investigated physical activity during the first year after Achilles tendon rupture and explored relationship between accelerometry-derived physical activity and patient-reported outcomes. Methods Participants used a waist-worn triaxial accelerometer for 7 days at 2 ( n = 42), 6 ( n = 39), and 12 months after rupture ( n = 53). Data were extracted as steps/day and physical activity counts (min/day; sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous). Participants were asked about their return to sport and completed the University of California Los Angeles Activity Scale and Tegner score for pre-injury and 12-month status. Achilles tendon total rupture score was completed at 12 months. Linear mixed models were used to assess the association of time, sex, age, BMI and treatment (surgical/non-surgical) on daily physical activity. Correlations were calculated between 12-month accelerometry-derived physical activity and patient-reported outcomes. Findings Daily steps and vigorous physical activity increased from 2 to 6 months (mean difference 1417 steps [ p < 0.001]; 1.0 min/day [p < 0.001], respectively), and moderate physical activity from 2 to 12 months (14.2 min/day [ p = 0.001]). Higher age and BMI were associated with lower daily levels of physical activity at 12 months. At 12 months, Tegner score correlated with moderate physical activity ( r = 0.394, p = 0.013). Achilles tendon total rupture score was 89 ± 11 points at 12 months. Participants resumed running 6.4 ± 2.5 months post-rupture. Interpretation Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily steps increased to population-based normal levels reported in the literature by 6 and 12 months, respectively. The findings suggest that, compared to uninjured individuals, Achilles tendon rupture may not severely compromise overall health-promoting physical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sukanen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: