Identifies conserved B-cell epitopes in canine papillomavirus L1 proteins, suggesting vaccine potential.
Background/Objectives: Canine papillomavirus (CPV) is an important viral pathogen associated with papillomatosis in dogs, with canine papillomavirus type 1 (CPV1) and type 2 (CPV2) among the most prevalent and clinically relevant genotypes. The L1 capsid protein is a major immunogenic antigen of papillomaviruses; however, conserved linear B-cell epitopes shared between CPV genotypes remain poorly defined. This study aimed to identify conserved cross-reactive B-cell epitopes within CPV1 and CPV2 L1 proteins and to evaluate their preliminary immunoreactivity. Methods: Conserved linear B-cell epitopes were predicted through integrated bioinformatic and structural analyses based on sequence conservation and surface accessibility. Three candidate epitopes were selected. Recombinant CPV1 and CPV2 L1 proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli), purified, used as recombinant L1 antigens, together with BSA-conjugated synthetic epitope peptides for mouse immunization. Antigen-specific IgG responses were assessed by ELISA, antigen-associated IFN-γ responses were evaluated by ELISpot, and cross-reactive antibody recognition was assessed by Western blot. Results: Recombinant L1 proteins induced strong antigen-specific IgG responses in mice. The selected peptides induced detectable but weaker humoral responses compared with the recombinant L1 proteins. Among the three epitopes, TPSGSLV and TVVDNTR elicited antibodies that recognized both CPV1 and CPV2 L1 proteins, while the epitope VIVPKVS showed minimal or no detectable immunoreactivity. ELISpot analysis showed only modest antigen-associated IFN-γ responses, particularly in peptide-immunized groups. Conclusions: This study identified conserved cross-reactive linear B-cell epitope candidates within CPV1 and CPV2 L1 proteins and provided preliminary immunological evidence supporting their potential relevance for CPV antigen design. However, peptide-induced responses were weaker than those induced by recombinant L1 proteins, and VLP formation, antibody neutralizing activity, and protective efficacy were not evaluated. Further studies in dogs, including optimized antigen-display platforms, neutralization assays, and protection studies, are required to determine the practical value of these epitopes for CPV vaccine development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: