Evaluates fire safety of PCM-integrated concrete panels, highlighting critical design considerations.
Phase change materials (PCMs) are increasingly incorporated into façades and wall systems to enhance passive thermal regulation; however, their fire safety remains poorly understood. While PCMs effectively reduce cooling loads, limited data exist on their behaviour under real fire exposure. In this study, the thermal response of PCM-integrated concrete panels was investigated through two-dimensional finite element modelling using an apparent heat-capacity formulation that accounts for phase change, latent-heat absorption, and encapsulation softening. Simulations were performed under the ISO 834 standard fire curve and constant furnace exposures between 200 °C and 800 °C for 60 min to evaluate insulation performance and encapsulation stability. Results show that PCM melting at approximately 31 °C provides a 20–25 min delay in rear-face temperature rise under moderate fire exposure (≤400 °C), maintaining the rear-face temperature increase below 180 °C for one hour. Beyond 500 °C, the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) encapsulation softens near 95 °C, suppressing latent-heat storage and leading to rear-face temperatures between 260 °C and 360 °C. Comparative analyses indicate that organic PCMs lose effectiveness rapidly unless protected by at least a 25 mm concrete cover, whereas inorganic PCMs exhibit superior stability owing to their non-combustibility and endothermic dehydration behaviour. The results identify performance trends, thermal limitations, and design considerations for the investigated PCM–ABS–concrete assembly under the studied fire exposure conditions. The validated experimental–numerical framework provides insight into the thermal response of PCM-integrated concrete assemblies and supports future development of fire-resilient building-envelope components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vedrtnam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: