Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduces Stakeholder Coherence Theory to achieve durable peace in Ukraine and Europe, suggesting shared incentives and reconstruction as key elements.
This paper introduces Stakeholder Coherence Theory, a framework proposing that durable peace emerges when rival powers derive dignity, prosperity, and security from preserving the same system rather than competing to dominate it. The theory is applied to the Russia–Ukraine War through the Bridge Settlement, a proposed framework that seeks to transform Ukraine from a contested frontier into a sovereign bridge state connecting Russian resources, European industry, Eurasian commerce, and Black Sea connectivity. The framework combines reconstruction, institutional modernization, economic integration, armed neutrality, and continental security coordination into a unified strategic architecture. Unlike traditional spheres of influence, which generate stability through hierarchy and exclusion, the Bridge Settlement seeks stability through stewardship, shared investment, transparency, and aligned incentives. Reconstruction is treated not as a post-conflict activity but as a core component of the security architecture itself. The paper develops the theoretical foundations of Stakeholder Coherence Theory, examines historical precedents including postwar European integration, analyzes potential failure conditions, and proposes policy pathways for Ukraine, Russia, Europe, Turkey, and international institutions. The central proposition is straightforward: Durable peace emerges when preserving the system becomes more rewarding than disrupting it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Dominik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: