Explores diuranium(IV) formation from uranium(III) complex and N-heterocycles, indicating significant reactivity insights.
The chemistry of the classical uranium(III) complex [U(N″) 3 ] (N″ = {N(SiMe 3 ) 2 } − ) is well-developed; however, there have been surprisingly few studies of its reactivity toward N -heterocycles. Here, we report the separate reactions of [U(N″) 3 ] with pyrazine, 4-azido-pyridine, and the methylene transfer agent N -(9,10-dihydro-9,10-epiminoanthracen-11-yl)methanimine (C 14 H 10 N 2 CH 2 ) to give the respective diuranium(IV) products [{U(N″) 3 } 2 (μ-NC 4 H 4 N-1κ N,2κ N ′)] ( 1 ), [{U(N″) 3 } 2 (μ-NC 5 H 4 N-1κ N,2κ N ′)] ( 2 ), and [{U(N″) 3 } 2 (μ-NC 14 H 10 N-1κ N,2κ N ′)] ( 3 ). The solid-state structures of complexes 2 and 3 respectively revealed bent U–N═C angles of 167.6(5) and 155.3(4)°, short U–N bond lengths of 2.070(5) and 2.104(4) Å, and diagnostic C═N ketimide distances of 1.297(7) and 1.364(7) Å. A combination of structural, spectroscopic, magnetic, and quantum-chemical calculations was required to confidently assign U(IV) ions exclusively in complexes 1 – 3 and to prove that 2 and 3 are ketimides rather than iminyls or nitrenes. Together, this study underscores the need for comprehensive analysis for the correct interpretation of the electronic structures of actinide complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodwin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: