Evaluates artifact generation in CBCT from different pins and materials, suggesting exposure mode impacts artifact severity.
Purpose: To evaluate the generation of artifacts from intraradicular pins and cementation materials in cone-beam computed tomography images, using different exposure protocols.Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted premolars human were divided into six groups such as G1: Fiberglass pin with Allcem cement, G2: Metal core fiberglass pin core with Allcem cement, G3: metal core fiberglass pin with Allcem Core cement, G4: Fiberglass pin with Allcem Core cement, G5: Fiberglass pin with Panavia cement, and G6: metal core fiberglass pin with Panavia cement.CBCT images were acquired on the Orthophos XG ® 3D (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany) following the protocols with the exposure parameters; 1) high definition (HD) mode (70 kV and 6 mA, voxel size 100 μm, scan time 14 s, 500 basis images), and 2) non-HD mode (70 kV and 10 mA, voxel size 160 μm, scan time 5 s, 200 basis images).Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests, Fisher's exact test and the McNemar test were performed to detect statistically significant factors.Results: For both HD and non-HD acquisition modes, the percentage of severe artifacts was higher in groups G3 and G6 (P<0.05).In the quantitative analysis, no significant differences were found among the parameters studied after accounting for all variables (P>0.05). Conclusion:The type of fiberglass pin and cement used did not affect the production of the artifacts.When evaluating the scanning modes, the non-HD mode, which had lower mAs and fewer image bases, showed less artifact severity on the assessed CBCT scans.(Imaging Sci Dent 20250320)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacerda‐Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: