Opinion piece explores how to balance educational missions and workforce demands in acute care surgery, suggesting practical frameworks.
Recent multicenter studies have explored the current and desired clinical work for acute care surgeons. Acute care surgeons oversee and provide comprehensive care in trauma, surgical critical care, emergency general surgery, and burn patients. While these studies provide crucial data to guide planning at individual institutions to help address understaffed programs, translating this research into local practice and culture requires nuance and consideration of system (regional, institutional, department, and divisional) factors and individual surgeon goals. This opinion piece confronts the paradox at the heart of academic acute care surgery: how can surgeons deliver on educational and research missions when staffing models place the highest prioritization on clinical work? We present a practical, evidence-based framework that aligns sustainable clinical staffing with preservation of the tripartite academic mission in acute care surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murphy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: