Retrospective cohort study describes gender-affirming care for transgender adolescents, suggesting need for enhanced healthcare.
Introduction: Medical care for transgender minors is understudied, largely because these forms of care are relatively recent. The primary objective of this work was to describe the cohort of transgender adolescents who initiated follow-up at the Strasbourg University Hospital before the age of 18, whether or not they began hormone therapy prior to reaching adulthood. Method: This was an observational, retrospective, single-center, descriptive study conducted among adolescents who had attended at least one consultation in our center before the age of 18 between January 2017 and March 2024. Results: Our population consisted of 115 patients predominantly made up of transmasculine (AFAB) adolescents (68%). Compared with the general population, we observed significantly higher rates of psychiatric co-occurrences, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Only 46.1% initiated gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in our cohort, and just 34.8% before age 18. A total of 6% of adolescents received puberty blockers as monotherapy. The mean age at GAHT initiation was 16.99 years. Transition pathways appear to differ according to the adolescent’s type of schooling. The rate of retransition/treatment interruption in our sample ranged from 0% to 6.1%, depending on the criteria applied. We did not identify any adolescent who retransitioned to their sex assigned at birth after starting GAHT by the end of the data collection. Discussion: The high prevalence of psychiatric co-occurrences raises important questions regarding how to improve care for these adolescents. The predominance of AFAB adolescents similarly prompts reflection on the barriers that transfeminine adolescents may face when seeking to transition before adulthood. In addition, the substantial number of adolescents presenting with ASD or ADHD underscores the need for particular vigilance regarding their specific needs and overall well-being. Finally, the variability in retransition rates depending on the criteria applied highlights the absence of a consensual definition, which limits the comparability and validity of existing studies. Conclusions: Long-term prospective studies are needed to objectively demonstrate the effectiveness of current transition pathways. Academic research in this field should be strengthened, along with the development of larger prospective datasets, to improve the overall health of this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schunder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: