Randomized trial evaluates simulation strategies for modular mobile robotic systems, suggesting platform-specific advantages.
Modular Mobile Robotic Systems (MMRSs) require simulation tools capable of supporting distributed control architectures, dynamic reconfiguration, and scalable experimentation. This work evaluates three complementary simulation strategies for a homogeneous MMRS composed of autonomous Two-Wheel Inverted Pendulum (TWIP) modules: (i) Webots, selected for rapid prototyping through its integrated GUI; (ii) Pinocchio, paired with the Jiminy simulator to enable modern rigid-body dynamics and control-oriented modeling; and (iii) PyBullet, chosen for programmatic flexibility and reinforcement learning (RL) compatibility. A minimal and controlled benchmark scenario was implemented across all platforms to isolate core simulation characteristics: two differentially driven robots were coupled using the most appropriate mechanism available in each environment and simulated for 1000 steps in headless mode while monitoring CPU usage, memory consumption, and execution time. In addition, a feature-based analysis focused on MMRS-relevant requirements, including dynamic reconfiguration, multi-agent scalability, and suitability for RL workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Băneasă et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: