Multidimensional assessment reveals challenges in wastewater systems, indicating a need for strategic renewal.
China has established the world’s largest municipal wastewater treatment system through rapid infrastructure expansion over the past two decades. However, under the transition from infrastructure expansion toward urban renewal and low-carbon development, wastewater systems are increasingly challenged by regional imbalances and structural inefficiencies. Existing studies have primarily focused on individual facilities or specific operational issues, while multidimensional system-level assessments remain limited. To address this gap, this study proposed a multidimensional assessment framework for evaluating wastewater system development in China from three dimensions: infrastructure adequacy, operational performance, and adaptive capacity. Based on national and provincial statistical data, regional disparities and development patterns were systematically analyzed using correlation analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results showed that treatment capacity expansion in several provinces outpaced sewer network development, resulting in low hydraulic loading rates and underutilized facilities. Extraneous water infiltration remained a widespread issue, increasing unnecessary wastewater handling, energy consumption, and treatment burden. Reclaimed water development was influenced more strongly by policy-oriented planning and water resource constraints than by economic level alone. In addition, eastern coastal provinces generally demonstrated stronger infrastructure adequacy and operational performance, whereas several western and northeastern provinces remained constrained by insufficient adaptive capacity and sewer coordination. Overall, China’s wastewater sector is transitioning from treatment-oriented expansion toward system-oriented renewal. Future strategies should prioritize sewer rehabilitation, hydraulic efficiency improvement, reclaimed water integration, and adaptive infrastructure planning. The proposed framework can support future infrastructure monitoring, regional policy evaluation, and low-carbon wastewater system transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: