Randomized trial explores allocation strategies in submodular settings, highlighting improved approximation for fairness.
In the problem of Submodular Max-Min Allocation, we are given a set of items, a set of players, and monotone submodular valuation functions that represent the satisfaction of a player with a certain subset of items. The goal is to find an allocation of the items to the players that maximizes the lowest satisfaction among all players. We study this problem in the special case where all players have the same valuation function. We devise a greedy algorithm which gives a 0.4-approximation, improving the previously best factor of 10/27 ≈ 0.37 by Uziahu and Feige. Furthermore, we study the integrality gap of the configuration LP when players have identical valuations. By constructing a variable assignment to the dual from a primal integral solution, we give the first constant upper bound on the integrality gap for submodular valuations. Generalizing the result to the case where players' allocations must be independent in k given matroids, we derive a 𝒪(k)-estimation algorithm for max-min allocation subject to k matroid constraints under identical valuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimon Boehmer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: