Randomized trial examines how women's opportunity costs impact fertility decisions, suggesting continuous subsidies enhance fertility intentions.
As a core component of childbearing costs, women’s opportunity costs provide a crucial perspective for explaining the current decline in fertility rates. Recognizing the reciprocal causality between women’s opportunity costs and fertility decisions, this study examines their statistical correlation using micro-level data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Building on these empirical insights, we develop a household fertility decision-making model that incorporates women’s opportunity costs, calibrating the parameters through structural estimation to quantitatively explore its impact on fertility choices. The quantitative empirical findings reveal a significantly negative correlation between women’s opportunity costs and the actual number of children in a household. The theoretical analysis demonstrates that an intensifying motherhood penalty and prolonged career interruptions due to childbirth both lead to a reduction in the equilibrium number of children. Furthermore, higher educational attainment and increasing child-rearing costs exert a pronounced inhibitory effect on fertility intentions. Policy simulations further indicate that, compared to short-term or one-off incentives, continuous fertility subsidies and the implementation of free childcare policies are more effective in offsetting opportunity costs and boosting household fertility intentions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: