Demonstrates improved target detection in SAR images, indicating advanced feature refinement techniques.
Target detection in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images is constrained by three primary challenges. First, speckle noise overlaps heavily with the high-frequency features of target edges in the frequency domain, so standard convolutions cannot suppress noise without sacrificing edge texture. Second, the scattering signature of a SAR target varies markedly with viewing angle, and a fixed-parameter convolution kernel cannot accommodate this spatial non-stationarity. Third, deep and shallow levels of the feature pyramid differ in semantics and resolution, and a naive element-wise sum either introduces noise interference or loses small-target signals. We propose the Frequency–Spatial Detection Network (FSDNet), whose core FSDBlock cascades three operators to address these failure modes in turn. Wavelet Convolution (WTConv) projects features into Haar sub-bands and applies independent low- and high-frequency kernels prior to inverse-DWT reconstruction, suppressing noise while preserving edges. Receptive-Field Attention Convolution (RFAConv) generates location-conditional kernels and so adapts to non-stationary scattering. Spatial Context Self-Attention (SCSA) aggregates discrete scattering points into coherent target representations via long-range grouped attention. At the fusion stage, CGAFusion replaces FPN element-wise addition with a channel–spatial–pixel triple-attention soft switch that mitigates deep–shallow semantic mismatch. On HRSID, FSDNet attains mAP50 = 92.3% and mAP50:95 = 68.6%. On SSDD, it attains mAP50 = 98.7% and mAP50:95 = 74.2%. Both sets of results consistently surpass the baseline methods. Against the strongest YOLO baseline (YOLOv11n), FSDNet improves HRSID mAP50 by +1.7 percentage points (pp) and mAP50:95 by +2.3 pp, and SSDD mAP50 by +0.5 pp and mAP50:95 by +2.7 pp; against the capacity-fair YOLOv11s reference (∼51% more parameters), FSDNet still leads on mAP50, mAP50:95, recall, and F1. Ablation studies and power-spectral-density analyses corroborate the contribution of each module and confirm WTConv’s role in preserving high-frequency target features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: