What question did this study set out to answer?

The article examines the crisis of judicial reparation and its narrative equivalent in Tolstoy's Resurrection.

June 10, 2026SlovoOpen Access

Le tribunal contrarié

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Literary analysis highlights Tolstoy's critique of judicial reparation in Resurrection, suggesting deeper implications.

The article examines the crisis of judicial reparation and its narrative equivalent in Tolstoy's Resurrection.
Literary analysis of Tolstoy's Resurrection (1899).
Historical contextualization of post-Reformation Russian courts.
Application of Gustafson and Ladner's Christian renewal ideologies.
Tolstoy presents rupture without compensation as the new paradigm instead of restoration.
Judicial processes remain unresolved, reflecting a critique of the legal system's effectiveness.
The novel is positioned as an expression of authorial repentance, showcasing a narrative shift toward the author rather than societal change.

Guilhem Pousson (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark