Randomized trial shows improved knowledge and confidence in clerkship students, suggesting effective teaching methods.
Introduction This study aims to evaluate a near-peer-led, low-fidelity spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) simulation on Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/Gyn) clerkship medical students’ knowledge, self-perceived confidence, and experiences. Methods A pre-post intervention study was performed. Senior undergraduate medical students (MS4s) served as near-peer teachers and presented an SVD lecture and simulation session using a low-fidelity manikin to clerkship students on the first day of the Ob/Gyn clerkship. Demographics, knowledge, confidence, and experience were assessed via anonymous surveys at three points: pre-simulation, post-simulation, and post-clerkship. Students who completed the rotation in the preceding 1 year (prior to simulation implementation) served as controls. Results 259 clerkship students completed pre- and post-simulation surveys with 71 also completing post-clerkship surveys. 54 students served as controls. Post-simulation knowledge scores were significantly greater than pre-simulation and controls (76.9% vs. 54.5%, p< 0.01; 76.9% vs. 53.3%, p < .01). Knowledge increased, though not significantly, from post-simulation to post-clerkship (76.9% vs. 84.1%, p=0.07). Ob/Gyn clerkship student confidence significantly increased for all components of the vaginal delivery immediately following simulation (p <.01). Following the clerkship, students were more confident delivering and examining the placenta than immediately following the simulation (3.6 vs. 3.4, p=0.03; 3.6 vs. 3.3, p=0.04, respectively). Participation in delivery of placentas and infants did not significantly differ between students who completed the simulation and controls (3(3) vs. 3(3), p=0.32; 1(2) vs. 2(4), p=0.32, respectively). Conclusion A 90-minute SVD simulation session at the start of the Ob/Gyn clerkship led by near-peers is feasible and significantly increases clerkship students’ knowledge and confidence to participate in an SVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schenken et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: