Randomized trial shows improvements in urban sustainable development via digital governance in China, suggesting broader implications.
This study examines whether government-led digital governance is associated with improvements in urban sustainable development performance in the context of China’s Information Benefiting the People pilot program. Using the pilot program as a quasi-natural experiment, we estimate a difference-in-differences model based on a panel of Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2010 to 2024. Urban sustainable development performance is measured using an entropy-weight TOPSIS composite index that integrates economic development, resource-environmental quality, and social life. The results provide evidence that pilot city designation significantly improves the composite index within this specific policy setting, and the finding remains robust after PSM-DID estimation, excluding the pandemic year and municipality samples, adopting one-period lagged specifications, and controlling for concurrent digital policy programs. Channel analysis provides evidence consistent with three potential pathways: industrial structure upgrading, green innovation, and government fiscal transparency. Moreover, environmental regulation strengthens the positive effect of digital governance, suggesting institutional complementarity between regulatory pressure and digital capacity. Sub-dimension analysis shows that the overall improvement is mainly driven by social life and resource-environmental quality, whereas the economic development dimension does not show a significant response within the study period. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals stronger effects in non-resource-based cities and ordinary prefecture-level cities, indicating that the effects of digital governance reforms may depend on local structural conditions and governance capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: