Comparative trial evaluates drop impact damage in cylindrical, spherical, and toroidal pressure vessels, indicating design influences.
Composite pressure vessels are highly vulnerable to accidental impact during manufacturing, transport, and handling. However, limited understanding exists regarding how vessel geometry influences this impact vulnerability, with no comparative study currently existing for non-cylindrical Type V geometries under certification-relevant drop conditions. Under an assumption of perfect interlaminar bonding, this study employs Abaqus/Explicit and the Hashin failure criterion to evaluate the intralaminar damage response of 18 configurations across three geometries, six drop orientations, and three layups. Simulations were conducted following the Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 13 guidelines, with a drop height of 1.8 m, for both unpressurized and pressurized cases. Vertical drops induced the most severe intralaminar damage, while the toroidal horizontal orientation remained completely undamaged. Optimizing layup to a [0/±45/90]2s sequence significantly enhanced damage resistance and limited the spread of material failure compared to the cross-ply [0/90]4s design. Internal pressure induced a stiffening effect that suppressed catastrophic fiber failure by redirecting damage toward lower-energy matrix cracking. These findings provide comparative numerical insights into the influence of vessel geometry and ply architecture on the intralaminar impact response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yahya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: