This article investigates slang's functions in communication, highlighting its sociolinguistic complexity and usage patterns.
This article investigates the role of slang as a functionally motivated and contextually conditioned stratum of natural language. While traditionally dismissed as a marker of informal or sub-standard speech, slang is reconsidered here as a sociolinguistically complex register that serves a range of communicative purposes, including identity construction, affective expression, in-group solidarity, and economy of discourse. Drawing on Dell Hymes’ (1972) SPEAKING model as a primary analytical framework, the article examines the situational parameters that govern slang’s distribution across formal, informal, and digitally mediated contexts. Empirical attitudinal data and corpus-based observations are used to map patterns of slang use and avoidance, with particular attention to the interplay between social relationships, communicative goals, and register choice. The article argues that a comprehensive understanding of slang requires moving beyond prescriptive judgments toward a descriptive sociopragmatic account that situates slang within the broader ecology of communicative competence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulnazkhon Alimova Yuldashaliyevna (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: