Cross-sectional study assesses hand hygiene compliance in healthcare providers, highlighting key influencing factors.
Background Hand hygiene is a critical, cost-effective measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections. Despite its importance, global compliance among healthcare providers remains low at 38.7%. Few studies in Rwanda have examined healthcare providers' knowledge, perception, and adherence, and factors influencing compliance remain underexplored. This study assessed healthcare providers’ hand hygiene compliance at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) and identified key influencing factors. Methods A cross-sectional study at CHUK involved 254 healthcare providers selected via stratified sampling. Data was collected through direct observation using the World Health Organization hand hygiene observation form and a self-administered questionnaire. Correlation and linear regression analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25 to identify factors influencing compliance. Results Overall compliance was 53.84%. Compliance was significantly higher among doctors (59.89%) than nurses (55.71%) and allied health professionals (38.42%) (p < 0.001). Factors influencing compliance included availability of handwashing facilities (r = 0.391, p < 0.01), availability of hand rubs (r = 0.124, p = 0.048), presence of facilities at the point of care (β = 17.855, p = 0.040), profession (nurses/midwives: β = 15.571, p < 0.001; doctors: β = 17.855, p = 0.003), awareness of WHO-recommended hand hygiene moments (β = 8.332, p = 0.033), and receipt of training (β = 10.600, p = 0.034). Conclusion The 53.84% compliance highlights the need for improved hand hygiene at CHUK. Facility availability and accessibility, awareness of WHO guidelines, and training significantly impact compliance. Enhancing these factors is crucial for boosting compliance and ensuring patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ndacyayisenga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: