The paper demonstrates how durable coordinated power emerges through minimal conditions, suggesting new insights on authority and legitimacy.
This paper addresses the foundational question of how durable coordinated power emerges. Starting from three minimal conditions — plurality, interdependence, and processing — it derives two independent structural paths showing that coordination necessarily passes through meaning, and that durable coordinated power stabilizes through a seven-dimensional coordination architecture. The derivations converge on four structural theorems specifying properties of institutional stability, role persistence, authority formation, and legitimacy under replacement of individuals. Rather than offering a historical or normative account, the paper provides a constitutive explanation of how stable power structures emerge from minimal coordination conditions. The argument situates debates on power, authority, legitimacy, and institutional order within a structural framework that connects coordination theory, social ontology, and political theory. Author maintains a coordinated research and publication apparatus at DURCHD8 ( https://durchd8.com/ ) — independent think tank for forensic structural diagnostics in contested information environments. Worked applications of the derivation appear in the case archive ( https://durchd8.com/case/ ) and the subject portal for Narrative Warfare ( https://durchd8.com/dossier/narrative-warfare/ ). The full term apparatus is documented at https://durchd8.com/the-durchd8-glossary/. Companion preprint on the Narrative Power Model is in submission preparation (May 2026).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Sauer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: