Key result
Atrial SMR predicts ~412% higher odds of improved forward stroke volume post-TEER versus ventricular SMR.
Why the study?
The clinical relevance of forward stroke volume in secondary mitral regurgitation has not been clearly defined.
Does transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair improve forward stroke volume in patients with atrial and ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=103)
No
Does transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair improve forward stroke volume in patients with atrial and ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation?
Odds Ratio: 5.12 (95% CI 1.04–25.9)
p-value: p=0.048
M-TEER improves forward stroke volume in atrial but not ventricular secondary MR, though this early hemodynamic improvement does not translate into better long-term clinical outcomes.
M-TEER may selectively improve FSV in atrial secondary MR; leaves open its prognostic value and need for prospective validation.
Introduction Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) is an established treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Forward stroke volume (FSV), reflecting left ventricular forward flow, is a prognostic marker in heart failure and valvular disease. However, its clinical relevance in secondary MR has not been clearly defined. Objective To assess the impact of M-TEER on FSV in atrial and ventricular secondary MR, identify predictors of FSV improvement, and evaluate its association with long-term outcomes. Methods In this retrospective single-center study, 103 patients with moderate-to-severe or severe secondary MR (ventricular MR: n = 60, atrial MR: n = 43) underwent M-TEER. FSV was quantified using left ventricular outflow tract measurements before and 4 weeks post-procedure. Clinical outcomes were assessed over a 2-year follow-up period. Results Procedural success (MR grade ≤ II) was high (ventricular MR: 95%, atrial MR: 100%). FSV remained unchanged in ventricular MR (49.4 ± 17.3 vs. 49.5 ± 16.5 ml, p = 0.960) but increased significantly in atrial MR (60.5 ± 21.7 vs. 66.8 ± 19.6 ml, p = 0.037). In multivariable analysis, atrial MR etiology (OR 5.12, p = 0.048) and lower baseline FSV (OR 0.36 per 10 ml/m 2 , p = 0.002) independently predicted FSV improvement > 10%. FSV responders and non-responders did not differ in functional status or residual MR grade. FSV improvement was not associated with reduced mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Conclusion M-TEER enhances FSV in atrial but not ventricular secondary MR. Atrial MR etiology and low baseline FSV independently predict FSV improvement. Early FSV improvement does not translate into improved clinical outcomes, suggesting that FSV response reflects hemodynamic adaptation rather than serving as a prognostic marker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grewe et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Secondary mitral regurgitation (n=103). Atrial secondary mitral regurgitation vs. Ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Forward stroke volume improvement > 10% at 1 month (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.04-25.90, p=0.048). Atrial secondary mitral regurgitation independently predicted a greater than 10% improvement in forward stroke volume after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair compared to ventricular etiology (OR 5.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: