Study ranks water quality vulnerability in a subtropical reservoir, suggesting intervention priorities for management.
Freshwater reservoirs face increasing threats from eutrophication and anthropogenic nutrient enrichment, yet practical multicriteria tools for ranking site-specific vulnerability remain underutilized. This study applies the PROMETHEE/GAIA multicriteria decision analysis framework to rank water quality vulnerability at five sampling sites (L1–L5) in Shanzai Reservoir, Fujian Province, China, using ten water quality parameters (TN, TP, COD, DO, Chl-a, pH, temperature, N:P ratio, transparency, and carbon ratio) measured monthly from April 2023 to April 2024. The PROMETHEE II complete ranking and the GAIA biplot together provide both a spatial vulnerability ranking and parameter-level diagnostic visualization. The Reservoir Centre (L5) ranked first (Φ = +0.32), exhibiting the most favorable water quality, while the River Channel (L3) ranked last (Φ = −0.44), with mean TN (1.15 mg/L) and TP (0.088 mg/L) exceeding Chinese Class III standards and Chl-a (35.89 µg/L) surpassing eutrophication thresholds. Intermediate rankings: L4 (Φ = +0.20), L1 (Φ = 0.00), L2 (Φ = −0.04). Spatial vulnerability followed a clear zone-level gradient: the riverine zone (L1, L3) was most vulnerable, the transitional zone (L4) showed intermediate performance, and the lacustrine zone (L2, L5) was most favorable, consistent with reservoir hydrodynamic theory. The GAIA biplot revealed that nutrient criteria (TN, TP, Chl-a) were the primary drivers separating site vulnerability classes. A sensitivity analysis across eight weighting scenarios confirmed that L3 ranked last in all scenarios (Φ = −0.450 to −0.694), demonstrating the robustness of the recommendation to prioritize intervention at the river channel inflow zone. These findings offer a practical, reproducible decision-support framework for water quality management prioritization in subtropical freshwater reservoirs, subject to confirmation through multi-year monitoring programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ijaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: