Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review analyzes reinforcement learning roles in hierarchical UAV control, highlighting future research directions.
As unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems evolve from automated execution toward autonomous decision-making, multirotor UAVs increasingly face complex dynamics, uncertain sensing conditions, and task-level autonomy demands. Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising learning-based paradigm for addressing these challenges. Existing surveys on RL-based UAV control predominantly classify methods from an algorithmic or learning-paradigm perspective, while relatively little attention has been paid to the functional roles of RL policies within the control loop. This often leads to an unclear correspondence between algorithmic characteristics and the requirements of different control layers. To address this gap, this review proposes a biomimetic “spinal cord–cerebellum–cerebrum” framework, organizing existing RL studies into low-level dynamic stabilization, mid-level perception–action coordination, and high-level task planning and decision-making. The proposed hierarchy emphasizes the functional role and intervention depth of RL policies within the control architecture, further supporting a layer-wise analysis of sim-to-real challenges. This review aims to provide a structured understanding of the roles of reinforcement learning in hierarchical UAV control and to highlight future research directions toward robust real-world deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: