Demonstrates a sustainable dashboard solution to reduce energy waste in thermoelectric power plants, highlighting environmental and cost benefits.
This paper highlights the eco-efficiency of a sustainable digital solution to support decision-making in resolving the problem of sudden production drops and associated energy waste in industrial power plants, especially those operating with a steam turbomachine. The solution involves a multi-interface digital dashboard that generates insightful visual reports and gives proactive alerting to the decision-makers about potential underperformances to ensure resource optimization. For the studied use case, it involves the development of three interfaces of the dashboard, so as to perform the sustainable monitoring of a thermoelectric power plant based on the Rankine–Hirn cycle as follows: the first interface is about real-time monitoring of thirty-two key physical parameters equipped with a notification system. The second interface displays the historical trends of all the plant variables, in order to help in detecting incipient abnormal deviations before they impact environmental efficiency. Lastly, the third platform covers a predictive model using the XGBoost algorithmic method to forecast the future behavior of the electrical power as the target variable of the power plant. The XGBoost method was selected after a comparative assessment which also included the algorithms of Random Forest Regressor (RFR) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). As a final step, this solution was later tested in a simulation environment built under the “Node-Red” platform, through an industrial decision scenario. The concrete findings validate the framework’s sustainability metrics, demonstrating the ability of the solution to help in preserving, for each production cycle of two years, up to 7.6 GWh of electrical energy that would otherwise be wasted, which translates into a potential cost-saving exceeding 633,247.9 USD, as well as an ecological impact by preventing the emission of 4628 tons of CO2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fakir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: