Study investigates lower-limb strength relationships with sprinting and jumping in youth soccer players, highlighting strength's impact on performance.
Background There is limited knowledge about the relationships between concentric and eccentric lower-limb strength and sprint, change-of-direction (CoD), and forward or lateral jump performance in elite youth soccer players. Objective This study investigated the associations between knee strength and sprinting, CoD, and single-leg jump performance in youth soccer players (mean age = 16 years; n = 41). Methods Maximal isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength (60°/s and 180°/s) and Nordic hamstring strength were assessed and correlated with single-leg forward hop and side-bounce distance, 10 m and 30 m sprint times, and 90° and 180° CoD test times. Results Pearson correlations revealed task- and leg-specific relationships. Stronger knee extensors at 60°/s were associated with faster 90° CoD performance, whereas stronger knee flexors and higher flexion-to-extension ratios at 180°/s were linked to faster 10 m and 30 m sprints. When the right leg acted as the inside turning leg, greater knee flexor strength (180°/s) was related to slower 180° CoD performance but faster 10 m and 30 m sprint times. When the right leg acted as the outside leg: (i) higher flexion-to-extension ratios (60°/s) corresponded to slower 90° CoD performance; (ii) stronger knee flexors (180°/s) with slower 180° CoD; and (iii) higher strength ratios at 180°/s with slower 90° and 180° CoD performance. No significant associations were found for the left leg or single-leg jump tests. Conclusions These findings highlight the movement- and limb-specific nature of lower-limb strength contributions in youth soccer players. Overall, hamstring strength supported sprint performance, whereas quadriceps strength underpinned CoD ability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spudić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: