Key result
Cardiac SBRT yields ~77% ICD shock suppression at one year in refractory VT.
Why the study?
Clinical outcome determinants in cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (cardiac-SBRT)/stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for refractory ventricular tachycardia remain unclear.
Does cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy improve safety and reduce ventricular tachycardia in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia?
Does cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy improve safety and reduce ventricular tachycardia in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia?
Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy provides sustained arrhythmia suppression with a favorable safety profile in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia.
Supports feasibility of STAR in refractory VT; leaves open efficacy, safety, and durability pending randomized data.
Background: Clinical outcome determinants in cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (cardiac-SBRT)/stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR), a minimally invasive therapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), remain unclear. We report the final analysis of Japan’s first prospective study following a previously published interim report. Methods and Results: Between 2019 and 2024, 8 patients with recurrent VT refractory to medical therapy and unsuitable for or refractory to catheter ablation were enrolled. Primary endpoints were safety and VT suppression. Exploratory analyses examined irradiation distribution and autonomic function. Median age was 69 years (75% male), ejection fraction 25%, and median follow-up 2.2 years. Targets were defined using multimodal assessment, with a median planning target volume of 88.9 cc. Treatment-related adverse events included only grade 1 nausea (n=1). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock suppression was 73.6% at 6 months and 76.8% at 1 year. Antitachycardia pacing suppression reached 97.9%, with near-complete suppression in 5 survivors. Analyses remained descriptive and hypothesis-generating. Heart rate variability suggested increased parasympathetic activity, and 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging indicated reduced washout rate. Three patients died within 2 years but had advanced preexisting heart failure; irradiation more often involved inferior segments. Survival differences were not explained by cohort-level B-type natriuretic peptide levels or systolic function changes. Conclusions: Cardiac-SBRT/STAR achieved sustained arrhythmia suppression. Heart failure severity, irradiation location, and autonomic function, with their interaction, may be associated with clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kabuki et al. (2026) studied Refractory ventricular tachycardia (n=8). Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (cardiac-SBRT) was evaluated on Safety and VT suppression (ICD shocks and ATP). Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy achieved sustained arrhythmia suppression in refractory ventricular tachycardia, with 76.8% ICD shock suppression and 97.9% ATP suppression at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: