Key result
Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with ~87% lower dissection surgery risk than Marfan syndrome.
Cohort (n=2,686)
Different genetic aortopathies exhibit distinct age and event profiles, with Loeys-Dietz and Marfan syndromes requiring earlier intervention, while non-syndromic HTAD patients face a high relative risk of dissection versus prophylactic surgery.
Background: GenTAC Registry enrolled patients with genetic aortopathies between 2007–2016. Objective: To compare age distribution and probability of elective surgery for proximal aortic aneurysm, any dissection surgery and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) among aortopathy etiologies. Methods: Retrospective/Prospective design. Participants with bicuspid aortic valve with aneurysm (BAV, n=879), Marfan syndrome (MFS, n=861), non-syndromic Heritable Thoracic Aortic Disease (nsHTAD, n=378), Turner Syndrome (TS, n=298), Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS, n=149) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS, n=121) were analyzed. Results: The 25% probability of elective proximal aortic aneurysm surgery was 30 years for LDS (95% CI: 18–37), followed by MFS (34 years, 95% CI: 32–36), nsHTAD (52 years, 95% CI: 48–56), and BAV (55 years, 95% CI: 53–58). Any dissection surgery 25% probability was highest in LDS (38 years, 95% CI: 33–53) followed by MFS (51 years, 95% CI: 46–57) and nsHTAD (54 years, 95% CI: 51–61). BAV experienced the largest relative frequency of elective surgery to any dissection surgery (254/33=7.7), compared to MFS (273/112=2.4), LDS (35/16=2.2), or nsHTAD (82/76=1.1). With MFS as the reference population, risk of any dissection surgery or CVM, was lowest in BAV patients (HR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.08–0.18; HR 0.13, 95%: CI 0.06–0.27). The greatest risk of mortality was seen in patients with vEDS. Conclusions: Marfan and LDS cohorts demonstrate age and event profiles congruent with current understanding of syndromic aortopathies. BAV events weigh towards elective replacement with relatively few dissection surgeries. Non-syndromic HTAD patients experience near equal probability of dissection versus prophylactic surgery, possibly due to failure of early diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holmes et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Genetic aortopathies (n=2,686). Bicuspid aortic valve with aneurysm (BAV) vs. Marfan syndrome (MFS) was evaluated on Any dissection surgery (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08-0.18). Compared to Marfan syndrome, patients with bicuspid aortic valve had the lowest risk of any dissection surgery (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.08-0.18) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.06-0.27).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: